Here you will read about the history of the Islamic Jihad from its beginnings at Mecca in 620 C.E. up to 9/11, and the lessons it has for us in today’s challenging times. If we are to understand Islam, we need to understand the temperament of its founder Mohammed PBUH*, the way victorious Muslims have treated the subject people, and above all the reasons for the victory of Islam.
View “Fitna”- an online movie by Geert Wilders, and get to know the soul of Islam
The History of Jihad site is brought to you by a panel of contributors. This site is co-ordinated by Robin MacArthur with Mahomet Mostapha and Naim al Khoury, New Jersey.
Other contributors to this site include professors and members of the faculty from the Universities of Stanford and Michigan (Ann Arbor), Kansas State University, Ohio State University, and the London School of Economics. We strongly suggest that this site be recommended as additional reading for students of Islamic History.
We also invite students and professors of this subject to mirror this site on your University or private servers, link it up from your sites, to print it as a non-profit publication and refer it to students, journalists, cinematographers, military personnel, members of both houses of Congress, and Parliamentarians from your countries, members of the judiciary and most importantly to officers of the FBI, CIA, Scotland Yard, MI5, Mossad, FSB (Russian Secret Police) Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure (DGSE) and to all other stakeholders in the subjects of the Islam and the Jihad.
How the Jihadis mercilessly vandalized Hindus of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh and wiped out Hinduism from some parts of India viz., Pakistan and Bangladesh
Describing a ceremony for collection of the jizya, the 13th century Shafi’i jurist an-Nawawi writes: “The infidel who wishes to pay his poll tax must be treated with disdain by the collector: the collector remains seated and the infidel remains standing in front of him, his head bowed and his back bent. The infidel personally must place the money on the scales, while the collector holds him by the beard, and strikes him on both cheeks”.
Fierce and persistent Hindu resistance to the Islamic Jihad prevented the complete Islamization of India
Unlike the complete Islamization of Persia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Turkey, North Africa, the Islamization of India was never complete. After more than one millennium of Muslim Tyranny from 715 up to 1761, more than 70 percent of the population of India remained Hindu. This was NOT due to any Muslim charity or benevolence, since the murderous and savage beastlike Muslims have none of these characteristics.
The Muslim tyranny in India was as blood-thirsty and insidious as it was in all parts of the globe that were unfortunate to be trampled by the Jihadis. The Hindus suffered initial setbacks due to the innocuous but ill-founded belief amongst them, as amongst all other non-Muslims, that the Muslims too were normal human beings, who would after a victory, settle down to govern the defeated population. But the Muslims were, and still are, compulsively paranoid mass murderers who can be outmatched only by someone who are themselves doubly compulsively paranoid mass murderers as compared to the Muslims. And only when such a mentality will prevail over Islam, can all the Muslims who infest our planet be neutralized either through their death or their conversion to any faith other than Islam. Only this way can our beautiful planet be saved from Islam.
The Crusaders were one example of such a mentality; as were the Franks (Feringhees or Firangis) under Charles Martel and the Mongols led by Hulagu Khan, who were the last such example. Hence only the Crusaders, the Franks and the Mongols could prevail over the Muslims and that too only as long as they nurtured and effectively used against the Muslims a mentality of being more compulsively paranoid mass murderers of the Muslims than the Muslim themselves are against all non-Muslims.
Unfortunately the Muslims till today are compulsively paranoid mass murderers, as their ancestors have been for fourteen centuries ever since that lecherous and heinous heathen Mohammed-ibn-abdallah founded the murderous cult of Islam in the year 622 C.E.
So as in all parts of the world which the Muslims destroyed with their tyrannical policies motivated by their murderous creed, in India too the Hindus suffered mass murders, rape, and destruction of their places of worship at the hands of the invaders. And the Hindus too were not, and still are not till today, compulsively paranoid mass murderers of the Muslims as were the Crusaders, the Franks or the Mongols. But in India, the only difference there was that once the nightmare of Muslim tyranny began, the Hindus grew wiser relatively faster than most of the other unfortunate victims of the Islamic Jihad and started paying back the Muslims in their own coin, although belatedly and only intermittently.
Go to this website - to continue with the History of Islams assault on INDIA:
AMPAC , the American Muslims Political Action Committee, a Muslim advocacy PAC, is planning a "million Muslim March" on Washington, D.C. The timing of their march is as orchestrated as the September 11, 2001 attacks on America and the September 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi.
They will be holding their march on September 11, 2013, but as you will see they seem to be engaging in a bit of taqiyya as to what the entire event is about.
The group is demanding, "that laws be enacted protecting our 1st amendment. We are asking President Obama to fulfill his promise from his first campaign for Presidency of a transparent government. Lastly, we are asking for the release of the 9/11 commission report to the American people," the event posting states on their website.
They will be rallying at 12 noon on September 11, 2013 on the National Mall, then the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White House "to hold truth to power at the three major branches of American government." While I agree with their statement that following 9/11, "the United States government as failed to protect and promote Constitutional liberties and human life, here and abroad," I cannot stand shoulder to shoulder with these groups who would not speak out against jihad.
In fact, several of the groups and individuals in them have been supportive of jihadist causes and make excuses for their actions. This group of Muslims is just like the homosexual community. They are demanding "special rights." They want to impose Sharia law, and they want the federal government to help them do it. This is why the feds have already begun to threaten the free speech of others in favor of Islamists, including threats of federal prosecution and imprisonment for speaking out against Islam.
Thank God, people in the United States are standing up to the tyrannical actions of the federal government when it comes to intimidating those who would speak the truth about Islam while pro-Muslim groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) praises the efforts of the Obama Justice Department to silence its critics. AMPAC's Chief of Operations Isa Hodge writes that Muslims and non-Muslims alike were traumatized by the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, "but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains." "Yet our Government either sits idly by and does nothing to protect our freedoms or it exacerbates the problem with its constant war on terrorism in Islamic countries, congressional hearings on Islam in America, and its changes to the NDAA law."
"These lies told to the American population has made it impossible for us to do true dawa," Mr. Hodge continues. One has to ask, is making it impossible to engage in dawa (Islamic proselytizing) a terrible thing? I think not. "It is time for us as Muslims in America to stop being defensive and start being proactive by using our right to vote and our freedom of assembly and let our voices be heard by our country and the world. Stand with us help us fight the injustices being committed against us."
**According to AMPAC's website, part of the group's mission statement seeks "to encourage and seek Muslim American candidates for public office and explain positions of other political candidates to Muslim American voters." Interestingly enough, outlets covering this event, have failed to refer to AMPAC for what it is, and they are intentionally leaving out "Muslims" in the title.
For instance, the Washington Post refers to AMPAC as "The American Political Action Committee."
Below is a list of Sponsors:
AMPAC - The American Muslim Political Action Committee AMPAC in cooperation and solidarity with PANDAA - People Against the National Defense Authorization Act, AMA - American Muslim Alliance, AMT - American Muslim Task Force, NDPAAC - National Democratic Party Asian American Caucus, NYDPAAC - New York Democratic Party Asian American Caucus, NABAB - North American Bangladeshi Association for Bangladesh, MDPAAC - Missouri Democratic Party Asian American Caucus, CLA - Community Leadership Affairs, SACC - South Asian Chamber of Commerce, Mosque Care, DC Area 9/11 Truth Movement ,A&E - Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Movement, OWS Movement, CAIR Los Angeles Chapter, MAS Freedom - Muslim American Society, MMAT - Muslim Marching Against Terrorism, MD Rabbi Alam - the Founder of AMPAC, Richard Gage - the Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Movement, Dr. Kevin Barrett - the National Spokesperson for Muslim Think Tank, Imam Mahdi Bray the National Executive Director of MAS Freedom, Will Coley National Political Director of Muslim for Liberty and AMPAC organizer of Tennessee and The March Against Drones (MAD) will be gathering on the National Mall, and then launching a march on the halls of power.
On Friday, AMPAC changed the name of the march. USNews reports: The demonstration originally called the "Million Muslim March" now has an explicitly secular name, the "Million American March Against Fear," organizer Isa Hodge stressed in a Friday interview with U.S. News. Media coverage of the event, scheduled for the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, exploded earlier this week. Hodge said he's irritated that many reports used the original name, which he says was changed in February after the addition of groups that doubt the official account of the 2001 attacks.
"They're focusing on what it was [called] before February to continue the misinformation and fear that we're trying to stop," Hodge said. "It's more sensational if they can put out there that it's just Muslims going to dance on the graves of the 3,000 souls that were lost that day. That's not what we're doing." Protesters will instead take to the National Mall to denounce government surveillance and call for "the truth" about the attacks, Hodge says.
Look, I don't think we've gotten the complete story behind 9/11, but even AMPAC's Facebook page, which cites this article, starts engaging in taqiyya. They wrote on Monday: This event is not about 911 truth, and it's not about Muslims being targeted, or even the NDAA...it's about more than that. It's about a day, a national tragedy, regardless of the culprits. That has been used to justify or excuse, every erosion of our liberties in the past 12 years.
From the Patriot Act, and the NDAA, to police militarization, and the national security state. MAMAF is about people. who are sick and tired of a corrupted government making slaves of free people. Confused yet? They have gone from stating this was about the First Amendment, to engaging in "damage control" due to the name of the march, and now there are conflicts over what the entire thing is even about. Is it about 9/11 truth? Is it about free speech? Is it about the NDAA?
Is it about Muslims being targeted? Apparently it's all of it and none of it. Seriously, Islamists cannot be trusted, and these statements demonstrate that. Given the event pages, I'm highly doubtful we'll be seeing many participants at this little gathering. I'm sick and tired of corrupt government. I'm sick and tired of liberties being eroded in this nation, but I cannot and will not join with those who ideology is anti-liberty and anti-American in order to protest such things.
U.S. intelligence agencies earlier this month uncovered new evidence that al Qaeda-linked terrorists in Benghazi are training foreign jihadists to fight with Syria's Islamist rebels, according to U.S. officials.
Ansar al-Sharia, the al Qaeda-affiliated militia that U.S. officials say orchestrated the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. diplomatic compound and a CIA facility in Benghazi, is running several training camps for jihadists in Benghazi and nearby Darnah, another port city further east, said officials who discussed some details of the camps on condition of anonymity.
The officials said the terror training camps have been in operation since at least May and are part of a network that funnels foreign fighters to Syrian rebel groups, including the Al-Nusra Front, the most organized of the Islamist rebel groups fighting the Bashar al-Assad regime in Damascus.
Testimony from victims now strongly suggests it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that used Sarin Nerve Gas during a recent incident in the revolution-wracked nation, a senior UN diplomat said Monday.
Carla del Ponte, a member of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told Swiss TV there were “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof,” that rebels seeking to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had used the nerve agent.
But she said her panel had not yet seen any evidence of Syrian government forces using chemical weapons (CW), according to the BBC, she added that more investigation was needed.
Damascus is facing growing Western accusations that its forces used such weapons, which US President Obama has described as crossing a Red Line. But Ms. del Ponte’s remarks may serve to shift the focus of international concern.
Ms. del Ponte, who in Y 1999 was appointed to head the UN was crimes tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, has sometimes been a controversial figure. She was removed from her Rwanda post by the UN Security Council in Y 2003, but she continued as the Chief prosecutor for the Yugoslav tribunal until Y 2008.
Rebel Free Syrian Army spokesman Louay Almokdad denied that rebels had use chemical weapons (CW).
This is very interesting, just a couple of days after the arrival of the UN chemical weapons inspectors, the Syrian opposition accused the Syrian army of killing hundreds of people by chemical agent Wednesday in the countryside of capital Damascus.
Local experts doubted that the army has a real interest in taking such a step while it is gaining the upper hand over the rebels.
Earlier in the day, the pro-opposition activists alleged that the government troops used chemical weapons in their attacks in rebel-held areas in the eastern countryside of Damascus.
Activists ‘ social networking pages also posted haunting photos of victims, including women and children, alleging that those were killed in the government troops’ attack. Syria’s main opposition group in exile, the National Coalition, said in a statement that 1,193 people were killed in the attack.
However, the Syrian army denied using chemical weapons, saying such accusations were part of a “dirty” media war against Syria.
Syrian Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi said the report came to cover for the rebels’ losses especially as the Syrian army is gaining the upper hand in the fight against them.
Wednesday morning, the army unleashed a wide-scale offensive targeting almost all the rebel positions in the countryside of Damascus. Sounds of air strike and shelling were clearly heard by mo residents in the capital.
Experts charged that the rebels resorted to such claim aiming to push the international community to intervene to stop the advancement of the army.
Hamdi al-Abdullah, a political analyst, scoffed at the rebels’ report, saying that they aimed to frame the Syrian army as the troops unleashed a ferocious attack around Damascus.
“The Syrian army has repeatedly said it would never use the chemical weapons for many reasons,” he said, adding “The huge army operation pushed the rebels to resort to such claim.”
For his side, Maher Morhej, head of the Youth Party, agreed with al-Abdullah, saying that the army’s operation pushed the rebels to make such
“They want to divert the attention of the UN inspection team to the countryside of Damascus and to tarnish the advancement of the Syrian
army,” he noted.
While stressing that the allegations are “games” the rebels were playing, Morhej did not shun aside the possibility of a real chemical weapon attack but by the opposition rebels “because they have the interest in stirring up the West’s fears and draw in intervention.”
He said if the rebels actually used chemical weapons, the UN team would figure out “but the problem is that the team would never be able to determine the party that used the weapons.”
The chemical frenzy came amid a UN mission here to investigate possible use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict. The probe was requested by the Syrian government, who accused the Western backed rebels of using sarin agent in the northern town of Khan al- Asal.
TheUnited States and its allies have expressed fears that Syria’s chemical weapons may “fall into the wrong hands” if the Syrian administration falls.
While Washington warns the Syrian forces’ use of chemical weapons would be “a Red line,” Damascus repeatedly stressed “even if we had such weapons, we would not use them,” and alleged the rebels might use chemical bombs against civilians to frame the government.
Weeeeellll no one wants war with Obama at the Helm
Well there you have it!
And 20% by neo-Nazis and the like. From the media coverage accorded to each threat, one would think those percentages would be reversed. "Counterterrorism Expert: Threat of Homegrown Terror Has Escalated," by Ellison Barber for the Washington Free Beacon, August 16 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):
The threat of homegrown terrorism has escalated in recent years, a counterintelligence and counterterrorism official said on Wednesday.
“To give you a sense of how big this thing is, and I’m only tracking the people and plots when somebody is arrested and charges are made. … Turns out now we’re up to 148 plots and 398 people,” David Major, a counterintelligence adviser to President Ronald Reagan and founder of the CI Centre, said at the International Spy Museum.
Homegrown or domestic terrorism is not confined to radical Islamists, Major said.Aaron Greene and Morgan Gliedman, Operation Backfire, or the shooting at theWisconsin Sikh temple show terrorists run the gamut of ideologies.
However, as a society we tend to focus on the acts perpetrated by Islamic extremists. Critics have questioned the practicality of this, but Major says it is a logical focus.
The majority of the 148 plots were motivated by Caliphate doctrine, a term for the ideology of Islamist groups such as al Qaeda, Major told the Washington Free Beacon.
Citing research from his institution, Major noted “114 plots or 77 percent of them are self-identified Caliphate plots,” and “about 20 percent” are groups such as “neo-Nazis, anarchists, the anti-government groups.”
A senior fellow at the Brookings Institute wrote al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists look at this period as “a model for what Islam should seek to revive, a caliphate that can unite the Islamic world or at least a large part of it, drive out the West, and be a player on the international political stage.”
One issue, Major’s argued, is how domestic terrorism is defined.
“Seventy-five of the  plots were to commit violent acts in the United States, that’s 51 percent. Forty-two wanted to commit violent acts overseas from the United States … [or] 28 percent, and 24 [or] 16 percent providing support to terrorism, in other words money collection, that sort of thing,” Major told the Free Beacon.
“So does that make them domestic or international terrorists? How do you define that number?”
Some have argued that domestic terrorism is a small threat, as plots only rarely come to fruition.
According to Major, many of the threats today are thwarted. Major cited recent examples at his briefing on Wednesday. Two instances he mentioned were of young American’s becoming self-radicalized.
Justin Kaliebe, of Babylon and Bay Shore, N.Y., was a student at Babylon High School, when he was “allegedly radicalized by online videos of al Qaeda leaders.” Authorities said the teenager intended to “travel to Yemen and join al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula [AQAP]… and participate in jihad,” but police stopped him as he attempted to board a flight to Oman.
Kaliebe’s charges were announced on June 26, 2013. He faces up to 30 years in federal prison.
In Jacksonville, Fla., Shelton Thomas Bell was indicted in July on charges he “conspire[ed] and attempt[ed] to provide material support to terrorists.” Like Kaliebe, Bell reportedly wanted to “travel to the Arabian Peninsula to join Ansar al-Sharia (AAS), an alias for al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and participate in violent armed conflict that he termed ‘jihad.’”
Bell is said to have “engaged in physical, firearms, and other training in preparation for armed conflict in the Middle East.” If convicted, he faces 15 years in federal prison....
Source Jihad watch ( pic from 9-11domore)
Egypt’s so-called Arab Spring quickly turned into a Christian winter following the political rise of Islamists and increased assaults on Christians and churches. As a result, an estimated 100,000 Christians have fled or are preparing to flee the country, according to a report by International Christian Concerns on Monday.
Seriously? He has no preference ? One would would think he does - considering the MBH is slaughtering Christians--- and he is Mr. Switzerland.
We think its clear
There seems to be something of a disconnect between who Egyptians think America is supporting, and who America actually is supporting in Cairo. In the U.S., story after story has been written about how the Obama Administration has bent over backwards not to call this latest change in government a “coup” and has been relatively muted in its reaction to the deaths of so many civilians – upwards of 1,000 in the last week alone.
Yet Egyptians remain convinced that President Obama is backing the Muslim Brotherhood and deposed President Mohamed Morsi. At a lunch at the Egyptian Ambassador’s residence on Thursday, Dr. Mohamed Abou El-Ghar, head of the Egyptian Social Democratic Party, bluntly warned a small gathering of journalists and policy wonks that he fears, “America is losing Egypt…There is a very strong perception that they are supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and they are against other parties,” he said.
The perception began even before the Egyptians elected Morsi, Abou el-Ghar said, when Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican and 2008 GOP presidential nominee, met with members of the Muslin Brotherhood in February 2012 but not representatives from competing parties. The headlines were: U.S. Warms to the Muslim Brotherhood. It was furthered when U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson criticized Egypt’s military for interfering in July when opponents deposed Morsi. That view has become more widespread since, with the Pentagon’s decision to defer delivery of F-16 fighter jets to Egypt and the Administration’s review of aid to Cairo.
The latest evidence of Obama’s purported proclivity towards the Brotherhood came in Thursday’s State Department briefing, which has made headlines in Egypt. In it, spokesman Jen Psaki says that the choice to detain of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak is an “internal Egyptian legal matter,” but in the next breath calls for the release of Morsi, who is accused of many serious crimes. Egyptians took this as further evidence that America is intervening on behalf of the Brotherhood still:
QUESTION: Do you have any comment on the release of former President Mubarak?
MS. PSAKI: Well, as we have long said, with respect to the Mubarak trial and decisions made, this is an internal Egyptian legal matter, that it’s working its way through the Egyptian legal system. Beyond that, I don’t have more for you. I refer you to the Egyptian Government.
QUESTION: Okay. So you have no feeling, no comment on the fact that the elected president, Morsi, is in prison and the former president who was accused of heinous crimes is actually out?
MS. PSAKI: Well, we’ve spoken – and I know you and I even spoke about this just yesterday.
QUESTION: Now that it has happened, I mean –
MS. PSAKI: Well, our position on Mr. Morsi remains the same. We believe there should be a process for his release. We’ve spoken frequently about our concerns about arbitrary arrests. And certainly, in order to have an inclusive process moving forward, an inclusive political process, we believe all parties need to have the opportunity to participate. It’s hard to do that when there are several members of one being detained.
Clearly, Obama doesn’t support the Brotherhood over the interim government. I’d argue he probably doesn’t support the interim government over the Brotherhood, either. Obama has said time and again that only the Egyptians can decide their future. But he may want to make it clear to Egyptians that he has no ulterior motives here and no secret preferences.
Four rockets fired from Lebanon toward Israel; Iron Dome shot down one of them.
Netanyahu: We'll Hurt Whoever Hurts Us
Israel Strikes Lebonan " Global Jihadist " meaning IDF thinks its AlQuada rather than Heezbella
Obama says " BLAH BLAH " Lebonan rocket attack is " provocative" BLAH blah ..We condemn everyone and everything BOTH victim and attacker blah blah bla............let me be clear
Israel news photo: Flash 90
"We are operating on all fronts, in the north and south, in order to protect the citizens of Israel from these attacks,” Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said Thursday in the aftermath of a Katyusha rocket salvo fired at northwestern Israel.
"We are using a variety of measures – of both defense and porevention – and we are operating in a responsible manner. Our policy is clear: to protect and also to prevent.
"Anyone who hurts us, and anyone who tries to hurt us, must know that we will hit him.”
Four rockets were fired from Lebanon Thursday afternoon, with at least one confirmed as having struck in the area of Nahariya.
Several residents have been treated for shock.
IDF reported that bomb shelters in the northern city of Akko (Acre) have been opened for public use, and the IDF is urging residents of the north to remain close to shelters.
The IDF has denied earlier reports from Arabic media that it responded to the rockets with artillery fire.
Lebanese media has been reporting that at least 2 of the rockets were fired from the Ras al-Ain neighborhood of the city of Tyre.
The IDF spokesperson's unit has said it believes the rockets were fired by "global jihad" terrorists - another term for Al Qaeda-linked or inspired Sunni terroristsת as opposed to the Shia Hezbollah terrorist group.
One rocket was intercepted by the Iron Dome missile defense system, between Akko and Nahariya, the IDF said. Three others struck in "open areas."
Earlier this month, four IDF soldiers suffered to moderate injuries on the Israel-Lebanon border, when a bomb was set off as they passed.
That attack was later claimed by Hezbollah.
This would not be the first time Sunni Islamist groups affiliated with the "global jihad" or Al Qaeda ideology have fired rockets from Lebanon into Israel.
Arieh Herzog, a former director of the Israeli defense ministry's Missile Defense Administration, warned "this kind of attack could provide (provoke) very serious action from our side."
He stressed, however, that missile defence capabilities were "much better" than they had been during Israel's 2006 war in Lebanon against Iranian Hezbollah.
"We don't have enough (Iron Dome) batteries... to cover each and every city in Israel," he told .
"But there's been a big change since the second Lebanon war. At that time, many rockets fell on the northern part of Israel. Our defences are much better today than in the past."
Iron Dome interception, 22.8.13 Israel news photo: Flash 90
Israeli aircraft struck a terror target south of Beirut, Lebanon, on Thursday night, said the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit.
the , a direct hit was identified and all aircraft returned safely to their bases.
The IDF statement said that the airstrike came in response to Thursday afternoon’s attack from Lebanon at northern Israel.
“The IDF sees the Lebanese government as responsible for the rocketattack,” stressed the statement.
Four were fired from Lebanon on Thursday afternoon, with at least one confirmed as having struck in the area of Nahariya.
One rocket was intercepted by the Iron Dome missile defense system, between Akko and Nahariya, the IDF said. Three others struck in "open areas." Several residents were treated for shock.
The attack was claimed by the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, an Al-Qaeda-linked terror group which had claimed similar rocket fire on Israel in 2009 and 2011.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu reacted to Thursday’s attack by stressing, "Anyone who hurts us, and anyone who tries to hurt us, must know that we will hit him.”
Lebanon’s president Michel Sleiman condemned the rocket fire from southern Lebanon, saying it was a violation of UNSCR 1701, which brought an end to the Second Lebanon War in 2006, and to Lebanon's sovereignty.
While Sleiman condemned the incident, the Lebanese-based Hezbollah terror group would not. A Hezbollah MP, Hasan Fadlallah, said his party was sticking to its policy regarding attacks against Israel.
Source Arutz 7