9-11 Do More Than Never Forget- Stop Islam's Assault

9-11 Do More Than Never Forget- Stop Islam's Assault
News about Islamic violence world-wide and the Islamic threat , driven by the Quran and its followers. Politics and the issues of our Allies Globally - will greatly effect whether we will be able to stop the spread of Islam and the violence that is backbone of this sick ideology. Islam is United Globally and so must all people who value Freedom be United to Stop Islam!

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Islam's Allah..read for yourself- he is simply the Worst of Humanity

Understanding ALLah – The Racist, Muslim-Supremacist Mind of the Islamic God - 2

Part 1 ]
The Koran is idiotic and infantile, yet an excellent but vain example of mankind's yearning to approach practical holiness and to delusional imaginations – that is, fantasy for the positional attainment of personal sanctification and redemption.
Year 621 AD, Surah 11 (verses 12, 17, & 113 may be from Medina period):
11/17 (Medina?): “Can they (non-Muslims) be like those (Muslims) who accepted a Clear (Sign) (there are many signs mentioned in the Koran, but not one single one is a valid proof of Allah, as it is nowhere proved that they are initiated by Allah) from their Lord (Allah)?” --- For building up his followers’ feeling of being superior to “the masses”, this is goodpsychology. This even more so if you want your followers to become a separate group, felling distance to other people or groups.
Year 621 – 622 AD, Surah 23:
23/28: “Praise be to Allah, Who has saved us (Noah’s people who the Koran claims were good Muslims) from the people who do wrong”.  ---  The best were saved – the claimed Muslims. But was it rightly done by a good god to kill all the others? Not to mention even the youngest of children got a chance to learn and perhaps later convert even? And did the bad peoples end up in Paradise? For those peoples killed by other peoples, ends there for the case that they might have converted if they had got time to think or learn (and those murderers must take over the victims’ burden of sins –this according to Islam).
032 23/117: “…the Unbelievers will fail to win through!” – But not the Muslims, as they are of much better quality?
Year 621-622 AD, Surah 32:
32/18: “Is then the man who believes (Muslim) no better than the man who is rebellious and wicked (the non-Muslim)? Not equal are they.” --- This really is an obvious answer that gives itself. Do you not agree?
16/75: “Allah sets for thee a Parable (of two men: one a slave or non-Muslim) under the dominion of another (a Muslim); he has no power of any sorts; and (the other) a man on whom We (Allah) have bestowed goodly favors’ from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means I say -praise be to Allah.)”  ---  This verse speaks not volumes or books, but gigabytes about how Muslims –the considered superior class and of the superior religion – look down on non-Muslims. Even their holy book tells them that non-Muslims are like slaves to them – praise be to Allah. See also 16/76 just below. Actually this verse also tells a lot about how Muslims looked (looks?) on slaves. And they do rightly, “praise be to Allah”. (These last words really give insights in their ways of thinking)...
16/76: “Allah sets forth (another) Parable of two men: one of them (non-Muslim) dumb, with no power of any sort; a wearisome burden is he to his master (Allah) …is such a man equal with one (Muslim) who commands justice, and is on a Straight Way?” ---  Whether this possibly strengthens the comments about 16/75 just above?
Now, we are about to transit from the Meccan part of the Quran to the Yathrib/Medina part (622 AD onward). There are 80 Surahs, and quite possibly 6 more (timeline uncertain), that likely belong to the Meccan periods. In addition, there are 22 Surahs that quite actually belong to the Medinan periods – 114 all together. Although this list is not a canonized one, we can see clear divide and huge change in the religion of Muhammad after Muhammad fled from Mecca to Yathrib/Medina in 622 AD. One knows the period of revelation (Meccan or Medinan) for nearly all the Surahs.
About Islam before 622 AD and Islam after 622 AD, the question will: Why this sudden change in campaigns? Or did this omniscient god simply change his (perturbed) mind and would want a much more bloodied resentful religion all of a sudden? – Or did Muhammad suddenly need warriors and highwaymen to survive the cause of Allah with his followers and get powerful for ruling the sand-dunes of Arabia… For, he and his bandit group categorically survived on robbery, thieving and extortions for several years after 622 AD? And, then who made these hasty deeply violent thought changes in a teaching that originally and for those early 12 years had been at least non-violent in nature? Was it Allah or was it just this

 begotten Muhammad?
When it comes to “we are the best”, there is no striking difference between “we are best” before and after 622 AD. After 622 AD are added violent hatred of unbelievers – murders, bloody battles and religious wars. Why this sudden change? Was it just there in Allah’s mind all the time and need the right time to come out?
This is entirely expected. Any “normal” new sects or religion has a need to mark the difference between “us” and “them” – and preferably in a way that makes “us” better than “them”. And when Muslims positioned themselves as a secure and powerful force ca 622 AD, Islam manifested itself in a very “inhuman” way and to a most striking extent – sanctioning the abnormal glorifications of ruthless murders, robberies, rapes, lucid suppressions, hatreds and killings. Islam changed drastically within a short period after 622 AD. While in Mecca, Allah was simply racist and Muslim-supremacist, in Medina after 622 AD, he becomes a hateful and violent dictator and freebooter.
Year 622 AD, Surah 16:
16/75: “Allah set forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave (= “infidel”) under the dominion of the other – and (the other) a man (= Muslim) on whom We (Allah) have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal?” A rhetoric question with only one answer – and of course we are better than those who are slaves under pagan gods. [Though, it is an open question who really were the blind slaves under their religion – the Pagans or the Muslims? In intense and extreme sects, the followers frequently are informal slaves of the leaders – not of the god(s) but of the leader(s).]
Year 622 AD, Surah 17:
47/14: “Is then one (Muslim) who is on a clear (Path) from his Lord, no better than one (non-Muslim) to whom the evil of his conduct seems pleasing”. Like more or less all such questions in the Koran, this is rhetorical and with seemingly one possible logical answer only – one that is pleasing and flattering for all believers and seemingly sobering for all proselytes.
47/15: “(Can those (Muslims) in such Bliss) be compared to such (non-Muslims) as shall dwell forever in the fire…”. See 47/14 just above.
Year 622, Surah 2 (likely the first complete Surah in Medina):
2/11: “Of a surety, they (non-Muslims) are the ones who make mischief”. – A clear distinction – and the raids Muslims already were making – and more to follow – was no mischief?
2/18: “Deaf, dumb, and blind – they (“infidels”, apostates) will not return (to Islam)".  -- Yes, they have to be deaf, dumb, and blind if they question all that is wrong in the Koran. A real good reason for looking down on them.
2/99: “…none (no Muslim) reject them (the signs of Allah - though not a single one of them are logically valued proofs for Allah, as there nowhere is proved that Allah is behind them) but those (non-Muslims) who are perverse”.  – The distance between the good Muslims and the bad non-Muslims grows, the latter are even perverse! (Not to mention the situation if they do not even belong to the People of the Book, namely Jews, Christians and Sabeans (Sabah was a Christian country approximately what is now Yemen – they had become Christians via East Africa, and perhaps a little different from the Greek Catholic the Arabs met other places – Islam often uses other explanations for the Sabeans though).
There is little reason not to suppress or rob or rape or kill perverted “animals”?
2/212: “But the righteous (good Muslims) will be above them (all others) on the Day of Resurrection….”  -- Of course, Muslims are the best.
2/254: “ Those (non-Muslims) who rejects Faith (Islam) – they are the wrongdoers”.  – If you read the Koran, you will many-many times find that non-Muslims are called wrongdoers. No comment necessary, except that it builds up under an enemy picture, an enemy often so base that he is a vermin and better killed.
2/257: “Of those who reject faith (non-Muslims) the patrons are the Evil Ones (the Devil and his helpers)”.   – Can human vermin be worse?
Year 624 AD, Surah 8:
8/55: “For the worst beast in the sight of Allah are those who reject him…”  -- Not strange that all Muslims are better than everybody else. It is not difficult to be better than the worst beasts.
Year 624- 625 AD, Surah 59:
9/20: “Not equal are the Companions of the Fire (“infidels”) and the Companions of the Garden (Muslims): it is the Companions of the Garden (Paradise) that will achieve Felicity.”  -- There is no doubt: In the eyes of Allah – Muslims are best. And in the eyes of Muhammad, they surely were best, because they gave him power and warriors?
Year 625 AD, Surah 3:
3/110a: “Ye (Muslims) are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind…”  -- It is not possible to disbelieve that Muslims are on the top of existing humans and human societies, as the Koran says so – and not one believing Muslim is aware of that words are cheap. It also is strengthening the picture of non-Muslims as vermin or at least sub-human.
3/110b: “….most of them (non-Muslims) are perverted transgressors”.  – Is it possible to add: that may deserve suppression and extermination – at least sometimes?
3/156: “Oh ye who believe! Be not like the unbelievers”.  – The unmistakable order.
3/162: “Is the man who follows the good pleasure of Allah like the man who draws on himself the wreath of Allah…?”   --- Of course, not. Muslims are better.
3/192: “Our Lord (Allah). Any (non-Muslim) …truly Thou coverest with shame, and never will wrongdoers find any helpers”. Of course, not! They are of so bad quality that they do not deserve any help.
Year 625-626 AD, Surah 61:
61/9: “…he (Muhammad or Allah) may proclaim it (Islam) over all religion, even thought the Pagans (= not Muslim, not Jew, not Christian) may detest (it)”.   – What the pagans mean, counts exactly nothing (and in spite of what the Koran says in 2/256 about no compulsion in religion. Thousands and thousands of them have been murdered through the times only because they refused to become Muslim – even pagan Arabs in the first years of expansion). (Something Muslims never mention is that 2/256 is abrogated and made invalid by at least some 30 later verses in the Koran. All educated Muslims know this, but all the same they use 2/256 as a proof for how infidel-friendly Islam is!).
Year 625-629 AD, Surah 33:
33/58: “And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin.”  -- But for Muslims to steal from, rape, suppress, and murder non-Muslims without being provoked was/is ‘good and lawful’ as long as you can name it jihad – and anything is called jihad as long as the opponent are non-Muslims, not to mention Pagans. No doubt Muslims are something much better, yes.
Year 626, Surah 4:
4/76: “Those who believe (Muslims) fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith (Islam) fight in the cause of Evil: so fight ye against the friends of Satan…”  -- So we all, who are not Muslims, are friends of Satan. Though we personally – and also the others – just wonder: Some great force that teaches stealing, destruction, rape, enslavement, suppression, murder, hate, war – is that a benevolent god?
4/92: “Never should a believer kill a believer…”  -- But non-Muslims, of course, are not counted. Tilling them perfectly OK?
4/93: “If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell…”  --  Not a word is said about killing a non-Muslim. Compare NT. But then there is the difference that Muslims are valuable, non-Muslims less so.
4/141: “And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers”.  – Muslims always will win over non-Muslims, according to this verse, at least in the end.
Year 627-628 AD, Surah 58:
58/22: “Thou wilt not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, loving those who resist Allah and his Messenger, even though they were their fathers or their sons, or their brothers, or kindred.” -- Really bad people it seems. This sentence deserves no comment, but it is an all too common one in sects where the leaders want full control over their followers even at the expense of the latter’s kindred relationship.
Year 627-628 AD, Surah 24:
24/3: “Let no man guilty of adultery or fortification or marry any but a woman similarly guilty, or an Unbeliever…” --- An unbeliever can make up for a depraved Muslim. It tells Muslims something about the difference between themselves and others.
Year 631 AD, Surah 9:
9/8: “…most of them (pagans) are rebellious and wicked.”  --- Of course, they are not even Jews or Christians, who are bad enough. Far below Muslim moral standard!
9/28: “Truly the Pagans are unclean…” --- They are the lowest caste – even lower than Jews and Christians.
9/67: “Verily the Hypocrites are rebellious and perverse.” --- No doubt, Muslims are better – and definitely not perverse, not even when robbing or raping or suppressing or killing, for that is “good and lawful” according to Allah’s holy book. And perverse people are to be despised, of course.
9/95: “So leave them (the not good Muslims) alone: for they are an abomination…” --- No comment need!
9/109: “Which then is best? – he (Muslim) that layeth his foundation on piety to Allah - - - or he (non-Muslim) that layeth his foundation on an undermined sand-cliff ready to crumble to pieces?” --- If there exists the smallest proof for Allah’s existence, there was no doubt about the answer.
Year 632 AD, Surah 5:
5/67: “For Allah guideth not those (“infidels”) who reject Faith (Islam).”  --- No, only good Muslims are worth guiding.
Year unsure, Surahs 11:
11/24: “These two kinds (of men (non-Muslims vs. Muslims) may be compared to the blind and deaf, and those who can see and hear well. Are they equal when compared?” --- Of course, not! Muslims are much better.
Some 1,400 years ago, followers of pagan-born Bedouin Muhammad in a flash founded the complete religion of al-ilah and thus began his personal quest to bring the rest of the world under the fit of Islam (literally: submission to Allah). More often than not, this submission was wrought by the edge of the Islamic sword. Several times it looked as though the Islamic JIHAD (literally: the struggles to bring about this submissions) would conquer the entire known world. The last time Muslim armies were turned back in this quest was September 11, 1683 – the day when an alliance of Christian armies led by Jan Sobieski III – the King of Poland – arrived at the Gates of Vienna to confront the advancing Muslim army. For the Islamic faithful, the date September 11th (9/11) is frozen in time—a day when their glorious Islamic vision for world conquest was stopped.
The more recent 9/11, however, marks the beginning of that great thaw! Once again the Islamic Jihad has come to life and is marching forward to take over this ambiguous world. As the West ignores this radical reality with all its attendant religious, political and ideological implications at its own perils—which is fueled by a genie’s treasure trove of petrodollars and emboldened by the extraordinary effectiveness of modern Jihadi terror—this challenge will only grow in intensity. It is absolutely vital that we understand the “deep insides of this Islamic mindset”.

This is NO  religion its Nazism protected by  a  religious  shield!  DO SOMETHING  ABOUT  IT- NO MORE  IMPORTING THIS IDEOLOGY.

TAKE  ACTION contact YOUR Government  REPS! 

Canada Contact Link
Australia Contact link

Dont  Forget  your  Religious Organizations
Vatican Contact Link

Italian MP: Anti-Semites Sitting in EU Parliament

Hard to believe we are fighting this fight in 2013 in Europe and the Uk Again! Currently disguised as anti zionism though this time it was pure unveiled anti Semitic hate.....
Italian MP Fiamma Nirenstein fights inclusion in EU parliament of representatives from ‘anti-Semitic’ European parties.

Fiamma Nirenstein

Fiamma Nirenstein
Fiamma Nirenstein
More than 30 MPs in the European Union Parliament stood in protest Monday to express support for a request to keep representatives from anti-Semitic parties out.
The request, filed by Italian MP Fiamma Nirenstein, seeks to challenge the membership of Greek representative Eleni Zaroulia of the Golden Dawn party, and Hungarian MP Tamas Gaudy-Nagy of the Jobbik party.
“Mrs. Zarouli declared in her parliament last October that the immigrants are ‘subhuman’ and Mr Gaudy-Nagy, during a conference on anti-Semitism held in this prestigious venue last June, spoke about ‘the Holocaust industry’ as a tool in the hands of the Jews to control the world,” Nirenstein told the Parliament. “I don't think their membership suits the values of the Council of Europe - an organization aimed a promoting the culture of human rights and tolerance.”
The positions both MPs have expressed violate the Statute of the Council of Europe, “which asserts that every member of the CoE must accept the principles of the rule of law and of the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedom,” Nirenstein argued.
The opinions voiced by the two MPs are part of a larger phenomenon, she warned. “I think we have opened here a fundamental reflection on a problem connected to the growth in Europe of neo-fascist parties and of a social diffused culture of hate and racism. No democratic parliament should accept them.”
In addition to Golden Dawn’s anti-immigrant incitement, party leaders have claimed thatHolocaust gas chambers were a myth. Jobbik has also made headlines for anti-Jewish statements: one of the party’s MPs recently called to compile a list of Jews in government “who present a national security risk to Hungary,” and a former Jobbik MKburned an Israeli flag in December.
The parties have caused serious concern among European Jewish leaders, who havecalled on the EU to act quickly to stem growing anti-Semitism and far-right extremism.
MP Fiamma Nirenstein recently announced that she will be moving to Israel.

Arutz 7

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Israeli jets have attacked a convoy on the Syria-Lebanon border- says BBC


Iron Dome interceptor battery near Haifa - 28 JanuaryIsrael's Iron Dome defence system has been deployed near Haifa

The attack came as Israel voiced fears that Syrian missiles and chemical weapons could fall into the hands of militants such as Lebanon's Hezbollah.

It is not clear what the convoy was carrying, but the latest reports suggest it was attacked on the Syrian side.

There has been no comment from Israel.

BBC Middle East correspondent Wyre Davies says the reports are impossible to verify, although some well-placed diplomats and military sources say they would not be surprised if Israel had acted, given the recent instability in Syria.

The Lebanese military and internal security forces have not officially confirmed the reports, but say there has been increased activity by Israeli warplanes over the country in the past week, and particularly in recent hours.

Iran threat

One report suggested there were fears in Israel that Syria and Hezbollah would take advantage of the overcast weather conditions to send weaponry across the border.

The Associated Press quoted a US official as saying the strike hit a convoy of lorries carrying Russian-made SA-17 anti-aircraft missiles.

A Lebanese army spokesman denied there had been any attack on Lebanese territory, according to L'Orient Le Jour newspaper. Others said an attack took place near the town of Zabadani in southern Syria.

Correspondents say an attack on the Syrian side would cause a major diplomatic incident, as Iran has said it will treat any Israeli attack on Syria as an attack on itself.

The attack came days after Israel moved its Iron Dome defence system to the north of the country.

Correspondents say Israel fears that Lebanese Shia militant group Hezbollah could obtain anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles, thus strengthening its ability to respond to Israeli air strikes.

Israel has also joined the US in expressing concern that Syria's presumed chemical weapons stockpile could be taken over by militant groups.

Vice Prime Minister Silvan Shalom told Israeli radio on Sunday that any sign that Syria was losing its grip on the weapons could lead to Israeli action, even a pre-emptive strike.

Analysts say Israel believes Syria received a battery of SA-17s from Russia after an alleged Israeli air strike in 2007 that destroyed a Syrian nuclear reactor.

The US government said in 2008 that the reactor was "not intended for peaceful purposes".



Obama's Friend the Peaceful Muslim Brotherhood says...

“The voice of violence shall prevail above everything else,” said El-Zomor, 

Islamist El-Zomor threatens violence against 'bitter' secularists
Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya spokesperson Tarek El-Zomor says 'revolutionary Islamists' would fight secularists if President Morsi is deposed 'illegitimately'
arek El-Zomor has threatened to use violence if President Morsi is forced from power.el-zomor
Jamaa Islamiya spokesman Tarek El-Zomor (Photo:Reuters)
“The voice of violence shall prevail above everything else,” said El-Zomor, official spokesperson of Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya's Construction and Development Party, in a statement released on Thursday.
El-Zomor’s threat comes before nationwide protests scheduled for 25 January to celebrate the second anniversary of Egypt's revolution.
He said that he was ready to fight any opponents of the Islamist current.
President Morsi was elected and can only be removed via the ballot box at the next presidential election in 2016, he added.
“If the president is forced out of power through illegitimate means, the Muslim Brotherhood, which is known to be peaceful, would have to step aside for revolutionary Islamists to fight the anarchists and secularists,” El-Zomor said.
“In this case, martyrdom will be the least we can offer to fight the communists, secularists and Nasserists,” he said. “They are jealous of the Islamists and their Islamic project.”


Screen Shot- Islam in Action..

Muslim Tries to Educate Me about Peaceful Islam, Then Calls for the Execution of Critics!

Our lovely friend @LearningKoran on Twitter recently responded to our critique of the #MyJihad campaign by telling me to read the Qur'an in context. Here's a screen shot of part of our exchange a few days ago:

Imagine my "shock" when I read his latest Tweets, calling for the execution of critics of Islam.

So was he practicing Taqiyya when he tried to convince me that Islam is a religion of peace? (Ironically, in the video he condemned us for making, we explained the concept of Taqiyya!) Or did he take my advice, read the Qur'an's violent passages in context, and conclude that critics of Islam must be killed?

Within days of me sending him a video explaining Surah 9 of the Qur'an, he began referring to Surah 9 as proof that Allah doesn't allow criticism of Muhammad.

@LearningKoran now condemns the #MyJihad campaign for being un-Islamic (when the discussion began by him defending the #MyJihad campaign against our claims that it's un-Islamic!):

I just had to send him a message requesting clarification:

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

VIDEO PLUS "Muslim patrols" target drinkers and gays in London

Three videos have emerged online showing several men harassing passers-by in the streets of East London for drinking alcohol, wearing short skirts or “looking gay”. These unidentified men describe themselves as a “Muslim patrol” that aims to apply sharia law in the streets near the East London mosque. While these appear to be isolated incidents perpetrated by delinquents rather than by organised radical Islamists, the authorities are taking them seriously

Screen capture from a video in which a hooded man goes up to another man drinking alcohol, and yells at him for doing this in what he calls a "Muslim area."
The East London Mosque, as well as several other Muslim groups, has expressed indignation at this behaviour. After receiving several complaints, London police have launched an investigation, and have increased their presence in the borough of Tower Hamlets, where the videos were filmed.
The men in the “patrols” are careful not to show their faces in these videos, which they heavily edited. (FRANCE 24 blurred the faces of the victims). All of these incidents are filmed at night. In one video, they use a megaphone to order a man and a young woman to leave the “Muslim area”, after taking issue with the woman’s short skirt. When the woman tells them she is appalled and reminds them that they are in Great Britain, one of the men replies, “We don’t care. It’s not-so-great Britain.” She calls them vigilantes, which he seems to relish: “Vigilantes, implementing Islam upon your own necks.” In the same video, the men also harass several other people for drinking alcohol. The men speak with native British accents, at times briefly switching to Arabic.
In another video, the “patrol” harasses a man they identify as gay, yelling at him to leave the “Muslim area” and making homophobic remarks. The man takes this calmly, sarcastically telling the ringleader: “Yeah, you’re such a man.”
In a third video, the men film several H&M lingerie advertisements that have been painted over to hide the model.
Speaking at East London Mosque during a sermon on Friday, Shaykh Shams Ad Duha responded to these videos, explaining that in his interpretation of Islam (and citing many texts and Islamic scholars to support it), trying to apply sharia law to non-Muslims actually goes contrary to sharia, even in Islamic states.
Video posted on Ebhrahim College's YouTube channel.
At 12 minutes into the video of the sermon, he says: “And we saw that video where? That was Tower Hamlets. Those are the streets of Tower Hamlets, in England. Enough said, right? … It’s a problem - I don’t know if it’s a psychological problem, or what – that people think that just because ‘I’ve now become practicing’ and so on, ‘I’ve got to go around and behave like a complete bigot.’ What people forget is that ‘how I behave just believing … and praying and implementing sharia within myself doesn’t give me the right to go out and behave how I like outside of myself.’ How you behave out on the streets with other people is also governed by sharia, by the teachings of Islam.”

“We live in England, not Saudi Arabia!”

Sajidah Patel is a university student.
I live not far from Tower Hamlets, but I first heard about these people in the Daily Mail, when they ran an article about their behaviour. [The videos were first written about by The Commentator]. As a Muslim myself it disappoints me to see young Muslims behave in such a disgraceful way. We live in England, not Saudi Arabia! Living in London, they have to adapt to the multi-cultural society we live in, or take a plan back home!
It’s not surprising, though, to learn that they are getting away with this behaviour, since the government has in the past allowed other groups like Muslims against Crusades, who tried to introduce “sharia law zones” , to spread their hate on the streets of London. [After a number of controversial incidents, the government ended up banning the group in 2011.] Authorities should stand up to groups who spread hate and do it quickly or else we will see more and more youngsters shunning their country and becoming involved in extremism, which is not the true face of Islam. They are giving ammunition to Islamophobic people when there are so many moderates like myself who want nothing more than to live side by side with our neighbours, in peace, regardless of the beliefs, colour or sexual orientation.

“I’m surprised this would happen here, where it’s a real melting pot of cultures”

FRANCE 24 spoke to more than half a dozen owners of businesses located near the scene of the videos, none of whom had encountered the “Muslim Patrol”. However, one pub patron, Robert Fox, had seen the videos.

We haven’t witnessed any such incidents, but it’s been a subject of discussion at the bar. People are basically saying that they should have the freedom to walk around here in peace, and that everybody should be entitled to their own beliefs. However nobody thinks these thugs are representative of all Muslims.
I’m very surprised this would happen here in Tower Hamlets. It’s a real melting pot of cultures; everyone is generally very amicable. I have never felt threatened by anyone. There is no “Muslim area” – people with all sorts of backgrounds live here, not just Muslims. There’s a good amount of police presence in the area, so I imagine these men won’t be able to bother people for long before they get caught.

Iran unveils machine for amputating thieves’ fingers

With Islamic Nations - Western Sanction and Obama threats are only seen as weak...Look at just one example of what they see as strength.

Do you  think anything short ofbrute  force  will stop the iranian  nuke program...or will stop Islam?
One of Iran’s official press agencies published photos showing the public amputation of a thief's fingers on Wednesday. These show a man getting his finger chopped off with a machine resembling a rotary saw.
WARNING: These images may shock viewers.
We contacted many of our Observers in Iran to ask them about this machine. Some of them had heard about it before, but many discovered its existence through these morbid photographs, which were reportedly taken on Thursday. According to the INSA press agency, the man shown getting his finger cut off was charged with robbery and adultery by a court in the southwestern city of Shiraz. He was also accused of being at the head of a criminal organisation. On top of losing one of his fingers, he was sentenced to three years in prison and 99 whip lashes.
No independent witnesses were able to recount the circumstances under which this amputation took place. Four photos of the scene published by the press agency were widely relayed on social media networks. Strangely enough, the man’s face did not betray any signs of suffering in the photos, though it is possible that he might have been drugged.
"Publishing these photos is a way to instil fear in the population so as to avoid any protests"
Contacted by FRANCE 24, the spokesperson for Iran Human Rights, Mahmoud Amiry-Moghaddam, who is based in Norway, explains: “What is surprising about this is that not only was this a public amputation, but that photos of it were distributed by official press agencies, and that they showed a machine that we had until yet never seen images of. We have noticed that the authorities have recently being making more and more publicity surrounding cases of corporal punishment. Every time we get closer to an election, the number of these incidents increases. And we’re getting quite close to the presidential election [slated for June]. I believe this is a strategy to instil fear in the population so as to avoid any protests.
Following the amputation, Ali Alghasi, Shiraz’s public prosecutor, announced that sentences against criminals would become increasingly severe, without explaining why.
On January 20, two thieves were hanged in public in Tehran. They had been caught thanks to video filmed by a street surveillance camera that showed them robbing a man at knifepoint. They had stolen the equivalent of 20 euros.
Amputation, whipping, and even death by stoning are all legal forms of punishment under Iran’s Islamic penal code.

Monday, January 28, 2013

British Muslim Charged in Journalist Kidnapping

Man charged in UK over journalists' Syria kidnap
A man walks past Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London on December 27, 2010. A 31-year-old man appeared at the court on Friday charged with providing financial support and supplies to his brother and another man who face trial for kidnapping two Western journalists in Syria.
A man walks past Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London on December 27, 2010. A 31-year-old man appeared at the court on Friday charged with providing financial support and supplies to his brother and another man who face trial for kidnapping two Western journalists in Syria.
AFP - A 31-year-old man appeared in a British court on Friday charged with providing financial support and supplies to his brother and another man who face trial for kidnapping two Western journalists in Syria.
Najul Islam, from east London, has been charged with assisting his brother Shajul Islam, a British trainee doctor, Jubayer Chowdhury and others to engage in acts of terrorism, police said in a statement.
The statement alleges that between January 1, 2012 and January 11, 2013, Najul Islam paid for his brother's travel to Syria, "knowing that he would be engaging or be prepared to engage in acts of terrorism in Syria".
It says he paid for supplies for the kidnappers, including night vision goggles, air rifle optic mounts and medical equipment, which he delivered himself by driving from Britain to Turkey. He also gave them his vehicle.
Najul Islam is also accused of sending money abroad to his brother, again in the full knowledge of what he was doing in Syria.
The charge sheet said he is also accused of "financing the travel arrangements for Jubayer Chowdhury to leave Syria after the release of the journalists and fly to Bangladesh, knowing that Jubayer would have been engaging or prepared to engage in acts of terrorism in Syria".
Najul Islam was first arrested on January 10, and then re-arrested on Thursday. At a hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London on Friday, he was remanded in custody to appear at the Old Bailey court on January 28.
Shajul Islam and Jubayer Chowdhury are due to stand trial in Britain in June on charges of imprisoning a British photographer and a Dutch journalist against their will last July while they were covering the Syrian conflict.


I Plead "Muslim": Pedophile Adil Rashid Spared Prison Due to Islamic Upbringing

Apparently, if a man has sex with a little girl in the U.K., he can avoid prison by pleading "Muslim." Since Muslims (according to the court's ruling) are taught that women are "worthless," they can't be expected to understand Western laws that prohibit sex with little girls. 

Daily Mail--A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.

Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.

Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’

Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.

But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.

Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.

They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on thephone over a two-month period.

They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.

The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.

Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray. He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.

He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced. (Source)

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Going For Broke- Hillary for 2016 ? quick read and share


According to Hillary Clinton’s long-delayed Benghazigate testimony, the State Department just did not have enough money to provide security for a mission in one of the most dangerous places in the world.

It did however have 16 million dollars to spend on 2,500 kindle book readers at the drastically inflated price of $6,600 per device.

It had $79,000 to spend on Obama’s books and $20,000 on a portrait of Obama. The US Embassy had $150,000 to spend on a book about the ambassador’s residence. 

There was $4.5 for art in embassies, but no money for Benghazi security.


Mullah Baradar’s capture by the CIA in coordination with the ISI was really the only serious victory won against the Taliban in recent years.

While Baradar is often referred to as second-in-command of the Taliban, with Mullah Omar’s whereabouts and aliveness still uncertain, he was in practice the leader of the Taliban.

Now Pakistan plans to release all Taliban prisoners, including Baradar.


Under Socialism, you don’t have to pass a law, you just have to use your economic control to make the companies enforce the law.

Growing government control over banks and investment companies, directly and indirectly, allows those institutions to be used to target firearms manufacturers.

Cerberus was bullied into dropping the Freedom Group which includes Remington and Bushmaster. Now Rahm Emanuel is demanding that TD Bank and Bank of America end their lines of credit to firearms manufacturers unless they come out in support of Obama’s war on the Bill of Rights.

The Party that claims to be upset at corporate influence over politics is trying to forcibly create a corporate lobby in favor of abrogating the Bill of Rights by exploiting their leverage over banks and the leverage of banks over private companies.

Obama Inc Trying to Use Banks to Destroy Gun Manufacturers


I considered writing an article after the disastrous results in Israel's election, but I really have nothing to say about it. Covering Israeli politics is like picking through the trash. Your hands get dirty and all you have for your efforts are trash.

Nobody really wins in Israeli politics, except the left, which keeps retaining its fading grip on power through every dirty trick in the book from fake third parties to paid voter fraud. Once again the fake third party strategy paid off, and considering the above-average voter turnout, the voter fraud was no doubt very extensive.

Mostly though the right self-destructed, as it has in the past, with Netanyahu continuing his program of staying in power by sabotaging the right and flirting with the left. The election boiled down to people on the right denouncing each other in attack ads in increasingly petty ways and the left profited. What could have been a national turning point, instead means more of the same.

The verminous Deri is back in a big way, back from prison and taking Shas back into left-wing politics. Surreal articles describe a center-right coalition with Haredi parties. In practice such coalitions are common, but defining the Haredi parties as being to the right is wishful thinking.

While Iran develops its nuclear program and the Palestinian situation worsens, we can look forward to more years of screaming fights between the Haredi-Dati Leumi-Secularists. A fight that Netanyahu has bizarrely chosen to enlist in. We can also look forward the endless social justice debates as the Tel Aviv parties continue to hijack national politics for their own petty pseudo-Euro antics.

And that's why I have nothing to say about it. Israel's politics aren't in the worst place that they could be, but they're still in the trash. Lapid's fake party, like the preceding ones, will fall apart. There will be more accusations of corruption, more police investigations and more media employees of tycoons going on about the influence of tycoons on politics. And so it goes...

If there was ever a wrong time for a culture war, it's now. The fall of the Second Temple shows how that went last time around. But history is a cycle. It's a wheel. It goes to the same places it came from. 


Despondent after George W. Bush won re-election, a small group of billionaire Democrats met in San Francisco in December 2004 to reflect on John Kerry’s failure to capture the White House. George Soros, Progressive Insurance Chairman Peter B. Lewis, and S&L tycoons Herb and Marion Sandler were angry and depressed.

They felt they had been taken—seduced by the siren song of pollsters and the mainstream media who had assured them that the capture ofthe executive mansion was theirs. But despite giving millions of dollars to liberal candidates and 527 political committees, the donors came away with nothing. At about the same time, another group of wealthy Democratic donors was meeting at a hotel in Washington, D.C., feeling the same way. “The U.S. didn’t enter World War II until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor,” political consultant Erica Payne told the meeting. “We just had our Pearl Harbor.”

Determined to bring the Democratic Party back from the political wilderness, Soros and the others decided they needed a long-term strategy to regain power. Former Clinton official Rob Stein urged them to copy conservatives who had spent four decades investing in ideas and institutions with staying power.

We just had our Pearl Harbor too. And we need that long-term strategy before it's too late. 


When Mitt Romney brought up Mali in the presidential debate, the reference was met with sneers from the left and bewilderment from the media. “Despite Romney Claims, Mali is No Afghanistan, Expert Says,” is how US News and World Report headlined the rebuttal. Three months later, it’s become increasingly clear that not only is Mali turning into Afghanistan, but North Africa is sliding down the same muddy slope.

The only thing that Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy had learned from the wars fought in Afghanistan and Iraq was to avoid the public turning on them by minimizing their casualty footprint. By avoiding troops on the ground, the trio thought that they had dodged all the problems that Bush and Blair had with Iraq. It never occurred to them that the reason Bush and Blair opted for occupation and reconstruction was to try and tamp down the resulting chaos. Despite their best efforts, their own people are coming back in body bags from Libya and Mali. And the killing has only begun.

...from my article, "North Africa Is the New Afghanistan"


The Anti-War movement was moving into high gear even as the Vietnam War was fading away. Americans troops were leaving Vietnam in large numbers and the last American offensive in Vietnam had begun the year before. But for the Anti-War movement, the actual war was only a pretext for undermining their country and promoting themselves.

Few men fit that description better than John Forbes Kerry who had not needed a weatherman to know which way the winds of political fortune were blowing. Vietnam Veterans Against the War became the platform for an aspiring Congressman seeking to remake his image. Despite its name VVAW was as bent on attacking the men fighting the war, as the war itself. Its publicity stunts, such as Operation RAW or Kerry’s own Senate testimony, were calculated to cast returning veterans as war criminals and murderers.

Toward the end of 1971, VVAW was balanced on the edge of its own irrelevance. The publicity stunts had brought it fame and undermined America’s position in negotiating a departure from Vietnam, but the departure was still underway. Rather than speeding it up, Kerry and VVAW had slowed it down to make the most of their moment in the sun, but once the public and VVAW’s membership realized that the war really was ending, so would their popularity.

While some in the VVAW were career radicals, Kerry was a radical careerist. Leftist politics were his way up the ladder, but he never let them get in the way of his own career.

... from "John Kerry: Unfit for Duty."


“We must never forget, brothers, to nurse our children and our grandchildren on hatred for them: for Zionists, for Jews,” Mr. Morsi declared. Egyptian children “must feed on hatred; hatred must continue,” he said. “The hatred must go on for Allah and as a form of worshiping him.”

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) on Thursday defended the Obama administration’s gift of four F-16 fighter jets to Egypt despite Egyptian President Mohammad Morsi’s newly-surfaced comments.

“President Morsi has issued two statements,” Kerry said, “to clarify those comments...  But not everything, and this is always the complication in dealings with the international sector, not everything lends itself to a simple clarity, black white, this that, every time.”

Nuance. It worked for Chamberlain. It will work for Kerry who will have to navigate the difficult task of being neither black or white, but yellow.


“We are not disguising the fact that the various satellites and long-range rockets that we will fire and the high-level nuclear test we will carry out are targeted at the United States,” North Korea’s National Defense Commission said in a statement released by the official news service.

“Settling accounts with the U.S. needs to be done with force, not with words,” it said.

This comes not long after another one of Kerry's great diplomatic breakthroughs with North Korea.

A prominent U.S. senator met Friday with North Korea’s nuclear envoy who promised to live up to commitments made in an agreement last week with the United States.

Democrat Sen. John Kerry said that the North Korean also made a “profound statement” about wanting a different relationship and not wanting to fight with the United States.

“They said that they will live by the agreement that they made last week, that we can count on that,” Kerry, who chairs the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, told reporters.

We can count on it. We can. Yes we can.


Colin Powell left the Republican Party on bad terms, twice, washing out of the Bush Administration, and then running to Obama out of spite at not being picked by McCain. Four years later he has nothing to show for it. The Republican Party hasn’t gotten into the White House, but neither has Colin Powell.

Powell can’t wait around another four years to see what happens in 2016, so he has nothing to lose. In 2008, he still maintained the pretense of being an objective observer looking for a transcendent figure to unite the country. Now Powell sounds shrill and angry. The accusations have become irrational and petty.

Colin Powell is pimping himself out on everything from gun control to false accusations of racism, showing how eager he is to do any of the dirty work that the Democrats might have for him.

The Colin Powell we see on the Sunday morning shows is a bitter man, angry over not getting as far as he wanted to go. It isn’t racial bitterness that Powell projects, but personal grievance. 

Colin Powell Isn’t Embarrassing the Republican Party, He’s Embarrassing Himself


France is increasingly upset by what it sees as limited Obama administration support for the war it is waging in Mali against al Qaeda militants.

The U.S. has yet to decide on whether to agree to France’s request for U.S. planes to refuel French fighters in flight, they said. France has a small fleet of aging refueling tankers and says more are needed to maintain the tempo of air operations in remote Mali.

Obama administration officials have said they support the French campaign but want to get a clear picture of the mission and the rebels being targeted in French strikes before providing more assistance.

Obama Refusing to Provide Support for France’s Fight Against Al Qaeda


Amran Jhah Syed Ali, a 23-year-old unemployed Pakistani asylum seeker, visited the home of his Italian fiance with his Chadian friend. They took advantage of the opportunity to empty a bottle of vodka between them.

This touching scene of multi-ethnic fraternisation was brutally interrupted when the Italian woman pronounced the name of Allah in vain. Her “fiancé” then attacked her after having broken the vodka bottle in fury.

The woman took refuge in her bedroom, where she locked herself in and called the carabinieri for help, at around 1 am, while the fiancé tried to break the door down.

Among the local newspapers, the Gazetta Iblea had the headline : “Paki handcuffed in the name of Allah”.Insula Report is more balanced and without doubt more exact: “Rage in the name of Allah and vodka”

Drunk Muslim Attacks Italian Fiance W/Broken Vodka Bottle for “Taking Name of Allah in Vain”


He has no trouble smashing police car windscreens with milk crates but it seems Muslim rioter Omar Halaby is not fit to work, receiving a $200-a-fortnight disability support pension.

In documents tendered to the Downing Centre Local Court, Legal Aid lawyer Sophie Edin said Halaby suffered from “certain disabilities” which had seen him claim the pension for the past three years. Ms Edin told the court. “He has literacy issues, a short attention span, things to that effect.”

We ain't no delinquents, We're misunderstood. Deep down inside us there is good!


Here lies the empty head of the professional liberal. The present isn’t a year or an age, it’s a moment. A passing fleeting thing.

1791 is an eternity away. A period of time that is so vast that he can hardly conceive of it, not because of the chronological distance, but the cultural distance.

How far away is 1791? To Matthew Modine, its an infinite distance measured by every liberal social gimmick that he is wedded to. The modern liberal is not an American, he is a citizen of Liberalvania, a fanciful magical kingdom where money is infinite and everyone gets gay married and then breaks into showtunes. It’s not a real place, it’s a state of mind.

Who’s Up for Another Celebrity Lecture About Gun Control?


The media maintained its embargo on President Morsi’s speeches until the New York Times chose to run a piece highlighting both the Memri released video and a second video, featured on Bassem Youssef’s show and now also translated and released by Memri, until the New York Times ran a piece on both videos. This was followed by a condemnation from the White House.

This is a show. A carefully staged show whose purpose is to divert attention from something else. And there are a number of candidates for what that something else might be.

The most obvious one is the Hagel nomination. The timing of the two are closely intertwined. Morsi’s comments had been around for a while. A staged condemnation of them however would allow the White House to posture as pro-Israel at an extremely critical period.

What is Really Behind Obama’s Condemnation of Morsi?


Obama’s CIA Director Pick Called for Censoring the Media

Man Banned From D.C. For Protesting Obama Inauguration

Mayor Bloomberg Doubled New York City Debt to $110 Billion

Communists Confess They Were Behind Israel’s Social Justice Protests

UN Giving Syrian Government $519 Million for Humanitarian Assistance

Muslim Brotherhood Using Benghazi as its Political Base

Algerian Attack Was Carried Out Using Weapons and Gear Provided to Libyan Rebels

Mexican Mafia Leader Sentenced for Trying to “Ethnically Cleanse” Blacks from California City

Newly Liberated Libya Rejects Attack on Mali Islamists


Baalzebub (pron.: /biːˈɛlzɨbʌb/ bee-EL-zə-bub or /ˈbiːlzɨbʌb/ BEEL-zə-bub; (Hebrew: בעל זבוב, Baʿal Zəvûv Arabic: بعل الذباب‎, Ba‘al az-Zubab;, literally "Lord of the Flies"; Greek: Βεελζεβούλ, Velzevoúl; Latin: Beelzebūb), with numerous archaic variants, is a deity that was worshiped in the Philistine city of Ekron.  

...from Lemon Lime Moon

21 Else, if thou wilt not let my people go, behold, I will send swarms of flies upon thee, and upon thy servants, and upon thy people, and into thy houses: and the houses of the Egyptians shall be full of swarms of flies, and also the ground whereon they are. -- Exodus 8

...from American Digest

The Jewish translation of that is a bit more intimidating than flies, but gnats are a good starting point.


This kind of mendacious demagoguery flourishes when the press is biased and/or cowed, and fails to challenge the political leaders.  Every appeal from the leadership gets to be emotional; government is discussed in unaccountable, irrational, and even hysterical terms, as when the president postulated, in his speech on gun restrictions during the same press conference, that the victims of mass shootings had been “denied their rights” by the shooters.  The distinction between committing crimes against individuals, which the citizens can do, and denying the people’s rights – which only government can do – is one of the most important concepts underlying the American system of government.  But Obama elided it out of existence on Wednesday, in his quest to depict the use of firearms as, principally, a means of injuring others.

from the Optimistic Conservative


It is the inherent, ineluctable nature of a state of zero in a person that a man who is lacking in character and values must be a destroyer. He becomes something when he is able to demonstrate his capacity for destruction. He must act to sustain the illusion. Destruction is his own proof of power.